Before we even reach the 90% efficacy claim, there is a more disturbing statistical maneuver hidden in the trial's methodology: Participant Exclusion. In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, thousands of participants were excluded from the final "per-protocol" efficacy analysis after randomization. The stated reasons were "protocol deviations" or "missing data." However, when we look at who was excluded, a glaring anomaly emerges. Let us look at the approximate distribution of exclusions: Placebo Group Exclusions: ~500 individuals Vaccine Group Exclusions: ~3,500 individuals (Note: Use exact numbers from the specific FDA briefing document you are referencing if possible) Why were seven times as many people removed from the vaccine group after they received the shot but before the final counting? ■ The P-Value: Do the Math Yourself I won't just give you the answer. I want you to verify it yourself. Take these numbers: [Vaccine Excluded: 3500, Included:...
"90% vaccine efficacy!" the news loudly proclaims. When hearing this number, most people imagine a magic bullet where "if 100 people get the shot, 90 are saved." However, that is an ingenious, perfectly legal "statistical trick" orchestrated by the media and pharmaceutical companies. This time, let's unravel the actual data from Pfizer's Phase 3 clinical trial published in the NEJM, the world's most prestigious medical journal, and expose exactly how they "dress up" their numbers. ■ The Reality of the Data (Infections per 1,000 People) The trial divided about 40,000 people into two halves. If we convert the results to a more intuitive "per 1,000 people" metric, it looks like this: Placebo group (fake shot): Out of 1,000 people, about 7.5 were infected. Vaccine group (real shot): Out of 1,000 people, about 0.4 were infected. Now, this is where the magic begins. ■ How the Media Reports It: The Trap of "Relative Eva...
Welcome back to Bakuro-cho . Recently, a woman asked me: "Why was the pension system actually created?" My answer shocked her, but it is the cold, hard truth of history. In the mid-20th century, the bureaucrats of Japan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) were looking at their rivals in the Ministry of Finance with envy. The Ministry of Finance controlled the nation’s taxes. The MHW wanted their own independent wealth. ■ The Great Bureaucratic Ambition The logic of the MHW Legions was simple and cynical: "We need a massive pool of money that we can manage and spend at our own discretion, without asking the Finance Ministry for permission." The solution? The Pension System. By forcing the entire working population to "save" for 40 years, the MHW created a massive, instant influx of cash. But they didn't lock this money in a vault for the future. They started spending the "contributions" immediately to build massive, unnecessary "we...
Comments
Post a Comment